Visualization
Almost all presentations contained strong examples of visualization of care processes. The presentations themselves also used many pictures and self made movies that made much more impact than just sheets. Some examples of visualization:
- Thedacare: each department has its "Visual Tracking Center": a wall that visualizes daily how the department performs on (e.g.) Safety, Quality and Cost, including effects of improvement activities.
- The Emergency Department uses 'real-time flow visualization' for each patient (!). Horizontally you see for each patient the steps and the expected flow. Below that the actual flow is indicated..If it's later then expected, it is circled red. A blue post-is hows where the patient currently is.
- A3 analysis of problems are filled in with colored visualizations: value streams, fish bone charts, spaghetti diagrams etc.
Thedacare (USA) - John Toussaint, MD, CEO
Very strong and inspiring story. He told his story with the same approach how Thedacare applies lean thinking in her 'Thedacare Improvement System': 1. Purpose
2. Process
3. People
1.Purpose
After five years applying lean thinking they translated their mission into three objectives (he states it should be three to achieve a strong focus). For Thedacare it is:
1. Each year 50% less "defect rates", e.g. infections
2. Each year 10% more productivity (they achieve 6% so far)
3. Each year more more improvement ideas from the work floor
2. Process
John talked about outpatient multidisciplinary teams setting up a treatment plan together with the patient. He also gave examples of "check points": points in the care process where the care provider determines whether all conditions are fulfilled before the next stage of the process is entered. He stressed the importance of transparency of their results, both internally and externally. They created a website: http://www.wchq.org where you can see how they perform relative to other providers in their state. They also keep accurate track of how many improvements are made. So far, 5300 A3's realized.
3. People
Every manager joins every week the discussion of the 'visual tracking centers' and coaches teams with questions.
Applying lean thinking
Dan Jones spoke of the convergence of :
Value Streams - Top-down vision, with
- Bottom-up improvement of processes, with
- The development of value streams.
Many examples and stories were given about improving entire value streams across departments. Also on managing value streams, including the position of a 'value stream manager'. Main task is to gain front to back 'agreement' on the right actions for the value stream, (no line responsibility over the value stream). A value stream manager also gave a presentation. Interesting but not convincing. Hospitals with long lean thinking experience are also still searching for the right approach.
How do people learn?
A demonstration made (hilariously) clear that learning works best when you see it (visualization) and a detailed explanation is given in small increments and you can practice it. Training Within Industry is an old and proven method for this purpose that's is underestimated. Focus is more on processes and continuous improvement, less on people
There were frequently referrals to the people aspect of the application of lean thinking and there were good examples. Considering the whole however, the people aspect remains subordinate to the improvement of processes. E.g. how people can have different views on reality and how to deal with this is not covered. Even though Toyota teaches us that 'respect' combined with 'challenging people' is one of the two core values of Toyota (the other is 'kaizen' or continuous, steady, improvement). In the lean thinking movement the people aspect remains secondary.
Royal Boston Hospital NHS Trust (UK) - Fill David Ingham, CEO
Besides many examples of the application of lean thinking he gave four stereotypes of the people they encounter in their lean endeavors:
- Positive outlook on life, but no grip on reality: naive idealist
- Negative outlook on life and no grip on reality: embittered cynic
- Negative outlook on life, but grip on reality: disillusioned skeptic
- Positive outlook on life and grip on reality: enthusiastic pragmatist
- Rigorous application of lean methods
- Convincing data
- Experience by applying, e.g. three-day "rapid improvement events"
- Ratify through change management and leadership
Leadership
Both CEO's considered the most important aspect of leadership: Genchi Genbutsu. Or: go to the source to thoroughly understand the situation. Every Thursday and Friday the day starts at the visual tracking center "(see above) of a department. Also, the CEO's regularly participate in overnight improvement events ('with the phone off'). The aim is to understand what is going on and why. By asking 'why?' again and again departments are coached while the director or manager understands what is happening in the organization. Main purpose of leadership: developing people and creating conditions for experimentation and learning.
Push - pull
Finally, a surgeon defined the complicated 'pull' principle very elegantly::
"pull means responding to demand''('push means that demand must comply with our supply").
All in all a very informative day with many powerful examples. Several hospitals demonstrated how much difference lean can make after 7 to 10 years' application of the principles. Yet is also clear (and they say so themselves) that they really only just begun. It takes a truly long-term focus and a lot of perseverance. After this day I feel energized again!
2 opmerkingen:
Nice summary of the proceedings, Marc.
It's unfortunate that the people aspect of Lean seems secondary. It certainly shouldn't be that way. We need to progress so that we're talking about both sides of lean equally - continuous improvement and respect for people.
I saw a similar criticism in an academic journal recently. I wonder if there's less focus on people in the presentations because it's harder to visualize and harder to measure our impact on improving people's engagement and satisfaction in the workplace?
But, the people side lends itself to vivid story telling in a conference setting. We should see and hear more of that, you are correct.
Perhaps we tend to do that because it's harder and takes much longer to change the way we treat people?
Is it because we want predictable (SMART) results, as soon as possible, that we focus much more on the processes?
The financial crisis has shown how dangerous this way of thinking is.
Would you agree?
Een reactie posten